Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Nope.

Stop and think about the fact that starlight can travel that distance. Therefore the accumulated dust along that path is not enough to block light. That little dust won't stop a bullet either.




But it's not just starlight - it's the light of a whole nova (and the collective light of a whole galaxy.)

I can see starlight from the bottom of a pool, but the water in the pool will still stop a bullet.

(I am not a scientist, I could be entirely wrong, but it seems like the collective dust of 12 million light years would surely ground down a bullet, while being intermittent enough to let starlight pass through in aggregate.)


Well let's calculate it. According to http://www.universetoday.com/30280/intergalactic-space/ there is about 1 hydrogen atom per cubic meter. According to https://www.google.com/search?q=light+year+in+meters&ie=utf-... there are about 10^16 meters in a light year. So 12 million light years is about 10^23 meters. Avagadro's number is about 6 * 10^23. So a tube a square meter across is a bit under 0.2 moles of hydrogen. According to http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080619205711AA... at standard air pressure a mole of hydrogen would be about 22 liters, so we're talking about 4 liters of gas at standard pressure. Which would be about 1 square meter across, and 4 millimeters tall.

The collective dust of 12 million light years of intergalactic space does not seem likely to grind down a bullet very much.

That said, the whole calculation is flawed because first you have to get out of our galaxy, which is much higher density. Though that also wouldn't stop a bullet. But then you have our atmosphere, and that most definitely would destroy a bullet that tried to pass through it!

But the moral remains. Space is empty. Really empty. Unimaginably so.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: