Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Doing real world, whole system profiling, we've found performance was affected by completely unexpected software running on the system. Recompiling the entire distribution, or even the subset of all software installed, is not realistic for most people. Besides, I have measured the overhead of frame pointers and it's less than 1%, so there's not really any trade-off here.

Anyway, soon we'll have SFrame support in the userspace tools and the whole issue will go away.






In one of my jobs, a 1% perf regression (on a more stable/reproducible system, not PCs) was a reason for a customer raising a ticket, and we'd have to look into it. For dynamically dispatched but short functions, the overhead is easily more than 1% too. So, there is a trade-off, just not one that affects you.

If 1% shows up out of nowhere, it's very much worth investigation and trying to fix it. You shouldn't let them freely happen and pile up.

But there are some 1% costs that are worth it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: